Pseudo Personalities and the manipulation of ideation and actions |Kaerah Lim

Image
Free Zenith autonomous thinking self help worksheet Resources and case studies of corruptions and manipulations: Self governance and the ruling elites, Government and corporation corruption and healthcare fraud. Ideas behind the framework of manipulation of personality: Poor ethics and morality and the main flawed intentions of idea inception and lack of autonomous character building and the beliefs system that serves as a foundation. By knowing this techniques of manipulation and creating positive versions of it, one will be hyper aware to the concepts of brainwashing without being in a close encounter to a manipulator. By building and aligning your own beliefs and triggers of memories, scripts of behaviours and self-belief system, you become a conscious creator who is aware of your habits and character and can act consciously again or beyond your current state of consciousness by growing your intrinsic motivations and intrinsic awareness to build your extrinsic persona and curating the …

Johnson Johnson Baby healthcare criminal act [bribery and the non-actions of the government]

Propaganda and terminology: word choice "awarded" instead of compensated and alleged criminal compensation to desensitise media to corporation's criminal act

The misjudgement in ethics and the acts of crimes: If there are over 110 million worth of damages in woman from the proven cause of talcum powder which is suppose and said to be safe as baby powder, the danger caused is not even a measure of the danger it could cause, instead of stripping baby powder out of its market, the criminals endorsed other criminals, to overturn the cause. This showed that no money was invested for public health or concern, that in its heartless call, it rather get back all the money.
"that it failed to adequately warn consumers of studies linking its products to ovarian cancer."

"After Echeverria died, her daughter, Elisha, was made the plaintiff in the legal case."


Not only that, no action was taken despite the acknowledgement in increased risk in many other diseases and cancer:
  1. "In a 2017 blog post called “5 Important Facts About the Safety of Talc,” Johnson & Johnson noted that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which identifies potential risk factors for many diseases, has not identified talc as a risk factor for ovarian cancer."
  2. "The International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), classifies genital use of talc-based body powder as possibly carcinogenic (cancer-causing) to humans."link

To overturn a possible poison, addiction just because it lack testing, in which all testing showed possible symptoms, is not a just call, and cannot be misdirected to ignorance of the company and definitely not the responsibility of the consumer.Especially when there were studies already indicating the urgency to strip such products, also, with the increased of consumer that came to harmed, that the formula might be more dangerous as compared to other products' on the shelves. Just like how we all wear mask without indication of why in the first place. It is ironic how the blame is always shifted onto the people.

  • May: A St. Louis jury awarded a $110 million talc verdict to a Virginia woman who claimed Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products caused her ovarian cancer.
  • August: Jurors in Los Angeles awarded $417 million to woman who claimed Johnson & Johnson talcum products caused her ovarian cancer.
  • October: A Missouri appeals court threw out a $72 million talc verdict saying neither the plaintiff nor Johnson & Johnson (the company she sued) were from Missouri. The court cited the Supreme Court’s Bristol-Myers Squibb decision.
  • October: A California judge overturned a record $417 million verdict in a talc lawsuit that claimed Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower talcum products led to ovarian cancer.
  • November: A Missouri Circuit Court upheld a $110 million talc verdict against Johnson & Johnson, despite the Bristol-Myers Squibb decision. The court found that a Missouri company, PTI Union LLC, had manufactured, packaged and labeled Johnson & Johnson’s talc products, giving Missouri jurisdiction in talc lawsuits against the company.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can you bring food on flights? (Carry-on, checked-in bags)

Counter Procrastination and Bad Behaviours

Body image help, healing body issue with Intuition and the mind part 2; The New Afterthought Episode 3